Chapter 12
DECISION MAKING AND REASONING
Updated: 2006-04-28
CLASSICAL DECISION THEORY
- Rationality
- Economic man and woman
- Identify all reasonable alternatives
- Choices are transitive
- Maxixe utility
- Utility = is related to value, but modified by
psychological variables
- Consider relevant information
- Estimating Likelihoods of Occurrence
- Objective and Subjective Probabilities
- Objective are like dice and cards
- Subjective may not always be equal to objective (and
lower, usually)
- hot hand in basketball is subjectively higher than
real probability
- Heuristics (Kahneman & Tversky)
- Availability
- basing judgment of the frequency of events on the
ease by which then can be brought to mind. For example:
doctors and nurses, police officers, shark attacks
- Illusory correlation: people overestimate the likelihood
of simultaneous events (e.g., stereotypes
- Representativeness
- basing judgment of likelihood on the degree to which
the particular instance resembles a general class. For
example: librarian, college professor, painter,
minister
- Base rate
- Gambler's Fallacy
- T T T T T T T T T ? (each toss is
independent)
- Anchoring-Adjustment
- The "anchor" is like a first impression. Later, the
anchor is adjusted up or down as necessary. However,
anchor often exerts undue influence
- Hindsight Bias
- After the fact, people overestimate the
predictability of an event. For example: the 9/11
attacks
- Framing Effects
- We prefer risk aversion when faced with potential
gains
- In other words, small but sure gain is better than
large but risky gain
- True even when probabilities are identical (see page
452)
- Overconfidence
- Sunk-cost Fallacy
- Previous investment justifies future investment (the
lemon car)
- Opportunity Costs
- Costs involved with opportunities are often
underestimated
- That new job back East with the high salary also
means a smaller house, a longer commute, and more
expensive green fees
- Critiques
- Heuristics are descriptive and atheoretical
approach
- Heuristics tend to be task specific
- Public Policy Decision Making: psychologists often inform
policymakers
- Cost/Benefit Analysis
- 100% safety is impossibility
- Known vs. statistical lives?
- Terrorism: How do you balance actual lives lost vs.
potential lives lost?
- Economic vs. Non-economic costs?
- Facts vs. Values
- Policymakers are the ones who make ultimate
decisions
- Scientists make scientific recommendations to
policymakers
- accuracy vs. criterion measures
- Foreign Policy
- Groupthink
- Groupthink occurs when a cohesive in-group makes
decisions without considering other, suitable actions.
Janis (1972) cited the following conditions as conducive
to groupthink:
- an isolated, powerful, decision making group
- lack of impartial leadership
- high levels of stress on the group.
- Bay of Pigs
- Fix groupthink by
- encouraging criticism
- being impartial
- look outside itself for answers
- break up into smaller sub-groups, each meeting
separately to consider other alternative
solutions.
- Economic Decision Making
- Economic theory (Bentham, 1789)
- Utility theory and Subjective Utility theory
- People make decisions strictly by economic
factors
- Homo economicus
- Bounded Rationality (Herbert Simon, Nobel Prize in
Economics, 1978)
- Prospect Theory (Daniel Kahneman, Nobel Prize in
Economics, 2002)
- "Satisficing" or responding to constraints like:
time, money, and resources
- Risk aversion: when dealing when gains, people are
risk averse
- Risk seeking: when dealing with losses, people are
risk seekers
- Cost traps: people who spend money already, tend
to keep spending even when they should not
REASONING
- Deductive Reasoning
- Drawing conclusions from premises:
- All men are mortal. Aristotle is a man. Therefore,
Aristotle is mortal.
- Conditional Reasoning uses if...then statements
- Inductive Reasoning
- Coming to a conclusion from a series of observations
- Will the Sun rise tomorrow? Can you prove that?
- Confirmation Bias occurs when people attempt to verify
their beliefs instead of trying to falsify them
- Learning from experience, but in a very selective
fashion
- Scientific Reasoning
- Scientists and Wason Selection task:
- Physicists (21-25% correct), Biologists (8-13% correct),
Psychologists (13-17% correct)
- Disconfirmation may be better strategy in science
too
AN ALTERNATIVE VIEW OF REASONING
- Two complementary Systems of reasoning
- Associative System (of mental operations)
- Similarities
- Temporal Contiguities
- Is quick to make decisions based on salient
features
- Uses loose constraints
- Rule-based System
- Rules stored in memory
- Uses rigid constraints
- Makes categorizations
- Rules out impossibilities
- Recognizes improbabilities
- Both parts fit nicely into connectionist models
COMMON THEMES
- Rationality is not enough in decision making. Empirical data
are also required. Results can be logical but wrong.
- Domain matters. Although logic applies in all domains, we make
better decisions when inside a concrete domain.
Back to Main Page